Budget Priorities
The alternative is to slash services, which would mean
dismantling
The budget process involves input from many people at many levels, and the Select Board’s collective priorities and recommendations are part of that.
I think that understanding the budget priorities and philosophies of those who serve the Town, or who seek to serve, is vital, and so I offer mine:
Top Priorities: For me, the most basic budget priorities are public safety, the schools and public works. These are our bones, and we must keep them strong.
Capital Investment: Building maintenance. Equipment replacement. Protection of Town assets. This is not exactly discretionary spending. The Finance Committee and the Joint Capital Planning Committee have a goal of dedicating 10% of the tax levy to capital each year. We never meet that goal. Deferring capital spending into the future may feel like short-term savings, but in fact, it increases expenses in the long-term. It is imperative that we make capital investment a priority.
Building Up Reserves: Not so long ago, the
Town’s reserve funds – its emergency savings – were plentiful. It is a very different story today. If we don’t take steps to actively increase
our reserves, the next economic downturn will be devastating to
The Salary
Question: Salaries and benefits is
by far the biggest chunk of our annual budget – employees are how we do what we
do. It is important that the Town Manager and others involved in contract
negotiations with the employees’ unions protect
Salaries, Part II: Talk about compensation levels being too high
in
First of all, it makes the most sense to me that such funding is a desirable thing to do after Amherst has met all its core town needs first, and that is not the situation we’re in this year.
The work being done by these agencies – and so many other agencies not included in the Town’s human service funding – is crucial to society, locally and on a much larger scale. What they accomplish with the resources they have available warms your heart and blows your mind. To me, that is a given. And entirely beside the point.
Funding Human
Service Agencies: This is always a
hot topic, one that gets attention out of all proportion to its dollar
amount. In FY08, the Town gave about $66,000
to human service agencies, and gave about $116,000 the year before that. In the context of a budget that is about $60
million, that is a small amount indeed.
To fund or not fund makes almost no practical difference to the Town’s
budget, so what to do? First of all, I
can’t prioritize this funding; I consider it too hard to justify. Among the reasons: we can’t afford all of our
standard municipal programs, services and costs – so how can we be funding anything
beyond that? Another: we fund only a few agencies. Should the Town be deciding which among its
local agencies are “worthy” of funding? Yet
another: private fundraising is the norm
for such agencies – that is not the case with the Police Department or the
Finance Department. I think it is a big
slippery slope. But it is also a
passionate issue among many, and I admit that the argument that such funding is
“among the things that make
Meals Tax: I think a meals tax would likely be effective
and would likely have no significant negative impacts. (I don’t consider this to be a simple “manna
from heaven” option. I encourage you to
read what
I have written previously on this topic.) But the most important point about the meals
tax is that it is a giant maybe. It may never even come up for a vote on
The O word: Override. Here’s my thinking about overrides: I think that Proposition 2 ½ prevents us from being able to raise the tax money we need to run the Town. It artificially constrains tax collection to a rate that fails to even keep pace with inflation, never mind the exorbitant increases in an area like health insurance. Limiting tax increases to 2 ½ percent has the effect of making our tax dollars worth LESS each year than they were worth the year before. That is an untenable situation. Overrides are our opportunity to fix that problem. It seems to me that those who oppose Proposition 2 ½ should be open to overrides, because overrides essentially give us the power to “repeal” that law. Of course, no one wants to pay higher taxes, and that expense has some serious implications for the town. But inadequate revenue has serious implications as well, which is why trying to achieve a proper balance is so vital. Also vital is for residents to have confidence that the Town is spending its money wisely, carefully and in ways that reflect the community’s priorities. No one wants to fund waste and inefficiency, and it is the responsibility of Town officials to ensure that that not happen.
You will not always agree with me. You will always know where I stand, and my
reasoning for it. If that is the kind of
transparency and accountability you want on the Select Board, I hope you will
vote for me on April 1st.